Sunday, April 10, 2005

Let Feardom Reign

My country, ’tis of thee,
Sweet land of liberty,
Of thee I sing;
Land where my fathers died,
Land of the pilgrims’ pride,
From every mountainside,
Let freedom ring!


The Department of Homeland Oppression has decided, in its infinite wisdom, that you and me and everyone else who travels to Canada (and Mexico) will require a passport to re-enter the country come 2007. And a citizen of those countries will be required to present a passport to gain entry into the US.

This really burns me up.

Those of us in the border states have spent a lifetime freely traveling across the border. We laughed at how ridiculous it seemed to even have a border crossing. On any given Saturday thousands of Canucks flock across the border to shop and sightsee, and thousands of Yanks do the same thing. We are the living embodiment of the oft-bandied about political catch-phrase, a community of nations, nations without borders.

My folks explained to me back when I was a wee kid that we were "free", and that means we're not required to carry papers or any other justification as to who we are and why we are there. They always said it proudly, pointing to the practice of "checking papers" in Nazi Germany, and being carted away to who-knows-where when they aren't in order. We've all seen the movies at least. One must be very careful when making such comparisons, as there is always an emotionally charged and indignant rebuttal awaiting those who do. And yet, if the shoe fits .....

I ask, what will be accomplished by such an edict? Do you think that a terrorist cell, with the technology and financing to create and deliver a weapon onto our soil does not have the know-how to forge a passport? Or buy one? Every dirt-poor border-busting illegal seems to know where to get forged official documents. It doesn't seem much of a stretch to conclude that a well-organized and financed effort would be inconvenienced in the least.

This is a useless and hollow act that will irretrievably alter the very conception of the word "freedom". It will change nothing those for whom it is supposedly intended, while changing everything for millions of lawful Americans, Canadians, and Mexicans. It will erase the practice of our open-border history, and with it, our national pride.

To my Canadian brethren, I apologize. I apologize that every authoritarion idea suppressed by our collective notion of freedom in the past 50 years has suddenly been embraced in a knee-jerk reaction to 9/11. I apologize that we Americans do not seem to have any further interest in defending the very freedom that sets us apart from the rest of the world, in which we used to pride ourselves go greatly. I apologize that we have deluded ourselves into believing that we can somehow trade freedom for safety, when in fact every ounce of freedom lost is gone forever, while promises of a risk-free existence will remain forever fleeting. We are giving up the very things that made us great in our relatively short history.

Perhaps it is not to late? We can stop this. But to do so, we Americans must have the collective backbone to stand up, address our government and say without equivocation:



HELL NO, WE DON'T WANT TO LIVE THIS WAY!


It is, after all, up to us. By the people, for the people? We the people. Do we have it in us to do this? To stand up and insist to our leaders that this is not what we want for ourselves? That we as a nation are willing to endure some measure of risk, to preserve some measure of freedom?

I sure hope so, because something precious, so very very precious is about to be lost. Forever.
o--()--o

Thursday, April 07, 2005

Two Tales of a Memo


Oooo, that pesky Schiavo memo. Actually, I didn't find it all that disturbing or shocking; one would be naive to think that it doesn't represent business as usual everyday inside the beltway, from both sides of the aisle; that's the pragmatic reality of politics. As well, the stiffie "support" of Schiavo already looked like naked politics to even the most disconnected observer. The issue was deftly dismissed by the rightie leadership as "RatherGate II", & would have died if the zealots had let it fade into the news fog of the Vatican.....

Well, the Mooney Times would not, and set about to teach those war-and-freedom-hating bleeders a lesson with their nifty scientific survey.

But today the tide turned with a feeble rightie admission (as it was no doubt about to bust wide open) though the admission was riddled with caveats such as "I don't know how it got on my computer", "I don't how it got printed and in my hands", "I don't know how it got from my hands to others". (as Jon Stewart would say, "now, uuhh, not that much" or Gilda Radner as Miss Emily Litella, "Never mind!!!")

Actual copy of memo.

Wednesday, April 06, 2005

Crazy Alert (CHEERS????!!!!)


Two stories, one crazier than the next:

It seems the Stiffs have taken fundraising to yet a new level (perhaps not?), lookie here.

Now the EPA wants to experiment on your kids in exchange for a thousand bucks and a camcorder. Outrageous!! I would hold out for $5,000 and ongoing medical expenses (plus the upgraded camcorder and an iPod)! Oh! And a duplicate package for each kid!!!

Sweet!!!

Thursday, March 31, 2005

Two Definitions


Pulled from dictionary.com:

lib·er·al Audio pronunciation of "liberal" ( P ) Pronunciation Key (lbr-l, lbrl)
adj.
    1. Not limited to or by established, traditional, orthodox, or authoritarian attitudes, views, or dogmas; free from bigotry.
    2. Favoring proposals for reform, open to new ideas for progress, and tolerant of the ideas and behavior of others; broad-minded.
    3. Of, relating to, or characteristic of liberalism.
    4. Liberal Of, designating, or characteristic of a political party founded on or associated with principles of social and political liberalism, especially in Great Britain, Canada, and the United States.
    1. Tending to give freely; generous: a liberal benefactor.
    2. Generous in amount; ample: a liberal serving of potatoes.

Synonyms: liberal, bounteous, bountiful, freehanded, generous, handsome, munificent, openhanded
These adjectives mean willing or marked by a willingness to give unstintingly: a liberal backer of the arts; a bounteous feast; bountiful compliments; a freehanded host; a generous donation; a handsome offer; a munificent gift; fond and openhanded grandparents. See also synonyms at broad-minded
Antonyms: stingy


con·ser·va·tive Audio pronunciation of "Conservative" ( P ) Pronunciation Key (kn-sûrv-tv)
adj.
  1. Favoring traditional views and values; tending to oppose change.
  2. Traditional or restrained in style: a conservative dark suit.
  3. Moderate; cautious: a conservative estimate.
    1. Of or relating to the political philosophy of conservatism.
    2. Belonging to a conservative party, group, or movement.

We report, you decide. How would you rather be known?

Monday, March 28, 2005

Nu Ma Nu Ma Iei

It looks I'm about two months behind the times on the latest internet phenomenon, but please don't take my cable modem or wireless router away, please. It took my 14 year old son to bring this jewel to my attention.

Apparently there's a Romanian band called O-Zone who took Europe by storm last year with a mega-hit called Dragostea Din Tei, which sounds very much like Eurythmics Disco (I don't mean that in a derogatory way; I like it). In this country, of course, we only listen or watch good ole' US of A fare (we've given Great Britain, Canada, and Australia a pass occasionally, as they speak the correct language), so it never took off here.

Enter some New Jersey teen and his webcam: A internet music video is born! Now there are several thousand websites with various iterations of it, and the kid's an unwitting cyber-star.

I've attached 2 versions: One with extra stuff edited into it, the other, pure.

Edited version with extra stuff
Pure original version
Lyrics (its in Moldovian)

Sunday, March 27, 2005

The Worst In Us


As the Terri Schiavo affair appears to be coming to a merciful conclusion, one can't help but reflect on all the conflicting impressions this will leave on our society and culture. One thing jumps out immediately: Despite the intellectual pundits who claim that we do not live in an ideologically deeply divided society, we do live in an ideologically deeply divided society which at times can seem to find no common ground. But this was a bit of a different division. Numerous polls indicate that instead of the 50-50 (left right) split we've come to expect over the last 4 years, this issue brought more of 70-30, or even 80-20 difference, effectively separating the mainstream conservatives from the extremists and pseudo-christians.

Some have written that this issue has demonstrated the best in us, with strangers maintaining a continuous vigil outside the Florida hospice where Ms. Schiavo resides, sending letters of support, and sending their 10 year old kids to be arrested for trying to bring her a symbolic cup of water.

This may be, but it has also brought out the worst in us. As usual, we have the hate-mongers who have persecuted Circuit Court George Greer and his family for the last 5 years. Judge Greer, described as a conservative christian, is the judge who originally ordered that Ms. Schiavo's wish be granted, that she be removed from artificial life support, and has repeatedly upheld that order through several legal challenges since. It was a very brave position to maintain given the endless stream of injury and death threats against his family and him. Ironic, the "right-to-lifers" making death threats......

Then there's the US Congress, meeting in an emergency session to pass cynical legislation which can only be applied to a single individual in a nation of nearly 300 million people for purely political gains (which may have backfired on them). And Jeb Bush, nearly causing an old west-style showdown between two law enforcement agencies as he tried to stage a quasi-legal raid on the hospice to kidnap Ms. Schiavo and bring her to another facility.

Lastly one must look at the parents. No parent could help but be sympathetic with parents facing the loss of a child, I can't think of a sadder situation. But the Schindler's have shown a particularly ugly side the last few weeks, which I have not seen before in the 2+ years I've been following this story. Whether its their healthy appetite for media attention, their using the federal and state judicial systems for their own personal playground, or their seemingly total disregard for their daughter's wishes (whom they lost 15 years ago), they have become very selfish and self-centered. One wonders what must be going through the minds of the less fortunate who can't get justice or proper medical attention, or of parents who have lost sons and daughters in a war against a country who was of no threat to us, and who's reasons are murky at best.

Friday, March 25, 2005

The Right of Privacy

USAToday

This, from the Friday March 25th edition of USA Today, The Nation's Newspaper and Sooray's favorite periodical. They quote an inciteful editorial from The Arizona Republic

When Congress hustles back from vacation to pass emergency legislation affecting but one American citizen, and the president does likewise to sign it, we have entered a realm not only of high drama but also of real consequences ... A government big enough, powerful enough, intrusive enough to butt into this affair is fully capable of butting into your affairs should it disagree with whatever agonizing choice you might someday be forced to make. We cannot begin to understand how that could possibly, in any way, be a good thing.

And on a personal note, I'm embarrassed to find myself "rooting" for the women's death, fearing that the dark forces will finally manage to contrive some 11th hour legal pretext to insert themselves once again into the situation. I am deeply sorrowful for all the parties rightly involved here, meaning the husband and the family. I am likewise horrified by all others claiming a dog in this race.
o--()--o



Tuesday, March 22, 2005

The Rise and Fall.....


If there was any doubt as to the righties' commitment to eventually pack the federal courts with out-of-the-mainstream right extremists, or to abuse their absolute federal power by promoting an extremist rightie-ideological agenda, such doubt should have been removed this weekend with the cynical law rushed through congress to assist Terri Schiavo's parents with their relentless quest to artificially keep their comatose daughter alive. One just has to read a single line of the arrogant new law to understand the precedent it sets, and the shape of things to come. The law states that it gives "any parent of Theresa Marie Schiavo" standing to sue in federal court to keep their daughter artificially alive. Screw states' rights, that's just a flowery phrase they throw into speeches to sound populist and noble. I can't think of anything these characters have done to date that demonstrates better their creed that the "rule of law" only applies when it agrees with your personal ideology. When it doesn't, simply change the rules. Welcome the the budding world of fascism!

So at least we're no longer talking about ANWR. I wonder what next week's topic-du-jour will be?

Saturday, March 19, 2005

ANWR


Coming soon.......
Ahhhh....... Wait till I get started on this one! You'll NEVER guess which side of this I'm on! (I'll give you a hint..... I've personally been to ANWR, Kaktovik, and Prudhoe Bay many times) And no fair Wightie guessing, he already knows.

Friday, March 18, 2005

"Pro-Life"??!!


"What's the difference between an anti-choice Democrat and an anti-choice Republican? The Democrat will also care about the child after its born!"

I'm paraphrasing DNC Chair Howard Dean's recent comments, though I believe I've kept his meaning is intact. The recent hypocritical brouhaha raised by the righties over the Terri Schiavo situation is typical of their "moral" standings: stand on theoretical principal, but be conspicuously absent when real life filters in (unless the issue affects their family personally). Even the US House is weighing in on this one; court rulings over the last 10 years leading up to this day and its events aren't good enough for them. These are the guys who boast of the "rule of law" in the US; I guess that only means something when the judges uphold their point of view. Otherwise, its "change the rules". (I'm surprised the House has time to get involved, what with the other more weighty issues they have taken responsibility for, like steroid use in major league baseball) This poor woman. They don't care a lick about her or what they're dragging her family through. Funny, if the whole family was actually united to keep Terri artificially alive, and they needed some government assistance to do so, the righties would be as scarce as a Texan at a Parisian crepe judging contest.

Righties' main concern

Thursday, March 17, 2005

Happy St. Patrick's Day!!!!!

Grab a good, heavy breakfast before you hit the celebratory circuit!

Good American Common Sense


Finally, some intelligent, no-nonsense straight talk about Gay Marriage. Thank god there are folk with the courage to stand up for traditional family values in the midst of rampant depravity. I'd make some clever comments about this article, but I don't think I could make him look more foolish; that job has already been taken. This is the crowd that swept the November '04 elections, folks. Somebody's god help us.........

The Basic Idea of Marriage Is to Raise Kids [Fox News]
via: Wonkette

Saturday, March 05, 2005

The Week's Potpourri


Naz-ti Byrd:
Another comical dust-up by the righties this week attacking Senator Robert Byrd (D-W.Va) for a speech in which they insist he likened them to Hitler and his Nazis. More hyperbole, IMHO, but see what you think. Then see Wonkette's recollection of some rightie Nazi accusations....... (When's it gonna be OK to historically compare political conditions to similar conditions in pre-war Germany without linking to the atrocities of Germany in WWII?)

Who you callin' "Elite"?!?: Interesting "celebrity" panel next week in D.C. discussing, among other things, "Is the Media Elite out of touch with America?". Does "Media Elite" mean publications like the New York Times which produce, thoughtful, intelligent, well researched, comprehensive articles (as opposed to USA Today, Fox and Newsweek)? And by "America" do they mean the folks who watch pro-wrestling and listen to Limbaugh? If yes to both, the answer would be, ah, no, not that much......

The Next War (sigh....): Looks like the Dubyas are so confident with Rove's approach (and why shouldn't they be?) that they're applying his election blueprint to public policy spin. The War on Social Security (to be followed by the Wars on Every Other Program To Help The Less Fortunate) now has its own Central Command.

Martha Makeover: Will we now see a kindler, gentler Martha? Regardless, the residents of New York State must be breathing a little easier knowing her movements are being monitored by an electronic ankle device. Alas, no more morning romps with the dog, the horses, or the reporters for the next 5 months......

Miracle Products: While Team W is busy making your life more miserable, there are still companies working to improve its quality through scientific advances. (Product One) (Product Two)

Finally........: A bumper sticker seen today: "What would Scooby do?"

Planet of the Chimps?


Moe?

What can one say about the seemingly premediated attack by two chimpanzees Thursday in California? My first thought was that "beloved" Moe had told his buddies a markedly different story about his early days than that put forward by his human "family". The three of them then crafted and executed a horrifyingly precise escape and revenge plan. "Get your hands off of me you filthy apes!" - Taylor
o--()--o

Friday, March 04, 2005

BBBad

"Hello? Mr. Flyboy? This is the Better Business Bureau calling. We need to speak to you on a matter of utmost importance concerning your company StumbleKing Enterprises? Would you please return our call as soon as possible?"

A dagger through my heart. Who's mad at me? What have I done wrong? Breathlessly I dial them back .....


Most folks think the BBB is a governmental agency charged with consumer protection. Far from it, first and foremost this membership based not-for-profit organization promotes itself.

The first rule of business is survival. Survival requires funding. Funding requires dues-paying members. Those dues pay for everything, including the salaries of all employees and directors. Some are large salaries. These then are the people responsible for enforcing the BBB code of conduct, interdicting poor and contrary business practices. With whom? Why those dues-paying members, of course. Do you smell what I smell?

When you see a company advertising with the BBB logo, you might think to yourself, "This is an honest company". What might be more accurate is, "These folks forked out the hush money to purchase a veil of legitimacy." Because that's what the BBB is selling. They're a protection racket, disguised as a consumer advocacy group.

Have a complaint? Take it to your Attorney General, who has the force of law in the arsenal.

Need a recommendation? Look to Consumer Reports as THE model on how to produce independent arm's-length evaluations -

To maintain our independence and impartiality, CU accepts no outside advertising, no free test samples, and has no agenda other than the interests of consumers. (Source www.consumerreports.org)

The BBB? That's paying your sister to tell her girlfriend what a great guy you would be to date.

So what did these jokers want from me? Why, membership of course. After scaring the bejesus out of me with their ominous we've-got-a-problem message, it turns out to be a common sales call. Perhaps they ought to read their own material -

BBBs champion marketplace ethics and hold member and non-member businesses alike accountable to the highest standards of honesty in their advertising and selling. (Source: www.bbb.org)

Yeah. What they said.
Lest this be attributed to an overzealous or misguided individual, I have been receiving these calls on average every six months for the past ten years. It is established sales technique.
o--()--o

Saturday, February 26, 2005

Good News!

According to SiteMeter, we have now passed 1,000 hits! Plus, we now have 4 contributors (2 of which are active). And last but not least, we've had our first international comment (a young lady from The Netherlands)!!

Thursday, February 24, 2005

A Bridge in Brooklyn

Shades of "hot" stock tips, Nigerian bankers, and waterfront property in Florida.

Last night's news story sang a familiar tune, this time focusing on a real estate setup. A company by the name of First Frontier Corporation is marketing, via the Internet, investment property in the purportedly swanky digs of Fairfield Glenn, Tennessee.



Surprise, surprise, this "can't miss opportunity" yields relatively worthless land. Federal Way, WA resident John LeLoup complains loudly that he was duped! He didn't worry he was buying sight unseen from a telemarketer. "The man on the phone said it was a moneymaker and that I would double my money within five or six months." With little to show for his exertion, Mr. LeLoup instead turned his worthless investment into his fifteen minutes. On local news no less! Still a poor return.

Frankly I cannot feel the requisite pity for Mt. LeLoup that the story demands. Or for any other such "victims". The unifying and common factor in each and every successful scam can be summed up with a single word. G-R-E-E-D.

Now don't get me wrong, I like greed. I'm all for it! It's what keeps us all working. But really folks, can we ever expect to receive something for nothing? Do you truly believe that can happen? Sadly quite a few do, and therein lies the problem. The only people who can (and will) fall prey to these schemes are those who actually believe that they can get something for nothing.

Paradoxically, it is the salesperson in the transaction that ultimately achieves this nearly impossible goal.

Wednesday, February 23, 2005

Enterprise

Looks like "Trekkies" are mounting a quixotic effort to save the current (and 5th) Star Trek series, Enterprise, from the cancellation dustbin. Few folks (among those of us who do not wear the costumes and go to the conventions) can claim to be a bigger fan than I, but I say let it go quietly; Enterprise sucks, lets face facts. I say focus energies on the creation of a new, quality Star Trek sequel, not on keeping a bad one for the sole sake of keeping it.

Lets hope any new series includes both Jeri Ryan and Jolene Blalock.......

Tuesday, February 22, 2005

American Girl Reality

Although I can't stomach the man, former NYC mayor Rudy Giuliani once said "why do some people spend their whole lives waiting to be insulted?". The context was that while there are certainly legitimate complaints about prejudice and cultural insensitivity in the media and elsewhere, there's also a plethora of issues blown out of proportion in the interest of ever intensifying political correctness. I listened to this piece on NPR with more than a bit of amusement. I think the some of the good folks in Pilsen need to lighten up.......

Definitions and Messaging

Very interesting perspective on each side of the political divide. Though there's no doubt on which side the author resides (just read the name at the top left. Ha! no pun intended!), it is a somewhat clinical and objective article.